Only after the dust settles do policy makers, media, and "experts" claim not only to have found the cause of a problem, but occasionally, that the effects were predictable!
If negative effects are predictable, why was the action put into effect in the first place?
But this is all in retrospect - Monday-morning quarterbacking, if you will. Let's start afresh, right now, because important issues are all around us - all the time.
But if we merely argue about them, we make no progress - for certain. How can we at least get started in having a conversation about important topics? Suppose, rather than saying "no", we say "yes" to the proposal, but then ask, "And then what?" What will happen - good and bad - if we enact a policy?
g
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|